Prince Harry Reportedly Asked His Former Charity Chair to Publicly Defend Meghan Markle
Image: Getty Images
In a recent turn of events, Prince Harry has found himself at the center of a controversy involving his former chair of the charity Sentebale, Dr. Sophie Chandauka. The relationship between the Duke of Sussex and his charity has been marred by allegations of bullying and mismanagement, particularly regarding the charity’s public image and interactions with the media. This article explores the incidents that led to the fallout, focusing on Chandauka’s claims and the implications for both the charity and the Sussexes.
The Allegations Against Prince Harry
Image: Getty Images
During an exclusive interview with Sky News, Dr. Sophie Chandauka opened up about her experience working with Prince Harry and the challenges she faced as chair of Sentebale. She accused Harry of bullying and mishandling key situations related to the charity’s operations. A notable incident occurred when Harry insisted on having a Netflix crew capture footage during a charity polo event. This decision significantly escalated costs, prompting a last-minute change of venue and raising eyebrows regarding the charity’s organization and accountability.
Image: Getty Images
Furthermore, the unexpected presence of Meghan Markle at the same event drew negative media attention, complicating an already tense situation. Chandauka’s criticism of Prince Harry highlights her concerns regarding the potential exploitation of charity events for personal branding and publicity. She believes that such tactics detracted from the charity’s mission and compromised its integrity.
The Request for Public Support
Following the controversial polo event, Prince Harry reportedly urged Dr. Chandauka to make a public statement in defense of Meghan Markle. However, Chandauka refused to comply with this request, firmly stating that the charity should not become a tool for public relations efforts on behalf of the Sussexes. Her decision reflects a commitment to maintaining the charity’s mission and values, distinct from personal interests that may arise from the lives of its high-profile patrons.
Image: Getty Images
This refusal further strained relations between Chandauka and Prince Harry, leading to deeper issues within the organization. Sources close to the charity alleged that Harry had been leaking unflattering information to the media, a move that Chandauka described as a form of harassment. Her dedication to the charity’s direction clashed sharply with what she perceived as Harry’s attempts to use the charity to sway public opinion.
The Aftermath and Resignation
In the wake of these unfolding events, both Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho decided to resign from their roles with Sentebale on March 25, 2025. They cited irreparable damage to the relationship between the charity’s trustees and Dr. Chandauka as the cause for their departure. This resignation raises questions about the future of Sentebale, especially amidst ongoing concerns regarding governance and strategic direction.
Image: Getty Images
Chandauka has publicly expressed her intentions to sue the charity’s trustees, suggesting further legal complexities that could emerge from the situation. While she emphasizes her commitment to uphold Sentebale’s mission, insiders from the organization argue that the trustees’ decisions were aimed at protecting the charity’s integrity during turbulent times.
Image: Getty Images
The ongoing drama surrounding Prince Harry and Dr. Chandauka underscores some of the significant challenges that charities face, especially when led by individuals with high profile public personas. The differences in priorities between Harry’s personal brand and the charity’s objectives have raised concerns about the current state of Sentebale and its ability to operate free from external pressures.
The issues unfolding between Prince Harry and Dr. Sophie Chandauka illustrate not just personal conflicts but also the intrinsic challenges charities face when linked to prominent figures. As this situation continues to evolve, it remains crucial for charitable organizations to prioritize their missions above individual reputations.
For readers interested in further developments in this story and similar charitable initiatives, staying tuned to updates on Sentebale would be beneficial.
