Prince Harry’s relationship with the Royal Family has been the subject of intense scrutiny 

and public discussion ever since he and his wife, Meghan Markle, decided to step back from their official royal duties in 2020. 

Over the past few years, the Duke of Sussex has made various statements and actions that have sparked both support and controversy. 

In recent commentary, an expert has claimed that Prince Harry’s criticism of the Royal Family was based on what they consider an “unnecessary” reason—one that, 

according to the expert, could have been avoided if Harry had chosen to take a different approach in handling certain aspects of his life and his royal role. 

This latest analysis adds to the growing body of discussion about Prince Harry’s evolving views on the monarchy and his relationship with his family members.

The expert in question has suggested that Prince Harry’s decision to publicly “rubbish” the Royal Family could have stemmed from the personal frustrations he experienced during his time as a senior royal, but that these frustrations might have been more manageable had he approached them differently. The source indicates that Harry’s critiques, which have come in a variety of forms—whether through interviews, documentaries, or his memoir—are centered around a few key issues that he perceives as having contributed to his desire to separate himself from the royal institution. However, the expert argues that some of the criticisms, particularly those aimed at his family members, appear to be based on a sense of personal disillusionment and dissatisfaction that may not have been as dramatic or irreparable as Harry made them out to be.

One of the key factors that the expert suggests could have contributed to Harry’s decision to lash out against the Royal Family is the perceived lack of support he felt he received, especially from his brother Prince William, and the general sense of being overshadowed by the monarchy’s traditional structures. As a younger member of the royal family, Harry has long been second in line to the throne after William, a position that he has openly stated caused him to feel as though he lived in the shadow of his older sibling. The expert suggests that this feeling of being sidelined may have played a larger role in Harry’s eventual decision to speak out, as he perhaps felt that his individual voice and concerns were not being heard or acknowledged by the family.

Another factor the expert highlights is Harry’s growing discomfort with the media scrutiny that he and his wife, Meghan, faced during their time as working royals. The couple’s experiences with the press were, according to Harry, harrowing and invasive, especially when it came to the treatment of Meghan. As the media attention on them intensified, Harry became increasingly vocal about the negative impact this had on their mental health and well-being. In several interviews, most notably with Oprah Winfrey, Harry and Meghan made shocking revelations about their struggles with the Royal Family’s handling of the media, which they claimed exacerbated their problems rather than offering any form of protection or support.

However, the expert suggests that Harry’s public criticisms of his family, particularly in the aftermath of his departure from royal duties, have sometimes been perceived as unnecessary, given the potential for more private channels of communication. Instead of airing his grievances in such a public manner, the expert claims that Harry could have taken a more diplomatic approach—one that might have fostered reconciliation or a more productive dialogue with his family. The expert believes that Harry’s decision to take his concerns to the media, and especially to pen his memoir, which included deeply personal details about his family’s inner workings, only further strained his relationships with his relatives. This kind of public exposure, according to the expert, may have led to irreparable damage in his connection with certain family members, who feel that they were unfairly criticized or portrayed in a negative light.

Additionally, the expert notes that Prince Harry’s decision to “rubbish” the Royal Family in such a public and aggressive way may have been driven by his desire to carve out an identity that was independent of the monarchy. For years, Harry was seen as the rebellious royal—someone who was always willing to challenge the status quo and fight for causes that mattered to him, such as mental health, veterans’ rights, and environmental issues. However, the expert contends that Harry’s decision to go public with his critiques of the Royal Family may have inadvertently undermined the very goals he sought to achieve. Rather than gaining support for his personal values and beliefs, Harry’s public disparagement of his family may have alienated potential allies and created a sense of division that overshadowed his positive messages.

Moreover, the expert points out that while Harry’s grievances are valid in many respects, the manner in which he chose to express them may have played a significant role in how the Royal Family responded. Rather than addressing his concerns behind closed doors, Harry’s decision to share his experiences in interviews, documentaries, and in print form may have led to a perception that he was choosing to attack the institution rather than engage in constructive dialogue. This public approach, according to the expert, may have caused the Royal Family to respond defensively, which further deepened the rift between Harry and his relatives.

It’s important to note that while Harry’s comments and actions have drawn significant criticism, there are also those who have rallied behind him and Meghan, particularly in regard to their stance on mental health and the mistreatment they faced from the press. Many believe that Harry’s motivations were rooted in his desire to protect his family and create a healthier environment for himself and his loved ones. Nevertheless, the expert maintains that his actions have had unintended consequences, particularly in the eyes of those within the Royal Family who have found themselves caught in the crossfire of Harry’s criticisms.

In conclusion, the expert’s analysis suggests that Prince Harry’s public criticisms of the Royal Family, particularly those labeled as “unnecessary,” could have been avoided or at least mitigated had he chosen a more private and constructive route to express his grievances. While Harry’s reasons for speaking out are understandable and often rooted in personal pain and frustration, the manner in which he chose to handle the situation has led to significant fallout, with some family members feeling betrayed by the public airing of private issues. As the relationship between Harry and his family continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether any reconciliation will take place, or if Harry will continue to distance himself from the monarchy that shaped his life for so long.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.